1. 五篇英語電影短篇影評 （ 影評和電影都是英文的）
2012 is a 2009 disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich. The film stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Danny Glover, Thandie Newton and Woody Harrelson. It was distributed by Columbia Pictures. Filming began in August 2008 in Vancouver.
The film briefly references Mayanism, the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, and the 2012 phenomenon in its portrayal of cataclysmic events unfolding in the year 2012. Because of solar flare bombardment the Earth's core begins heating up at an unprecedented rate, eventually causing crustal displacement. This results in an onslaught of Doomsday event scenarios plunging the world into chaos, ranging from California falling into the Pacific Ocean, the eruption of the Yellowstone National Park caldera, massive earthquakes, and Megatsunami impacts along every coast line on the Earth. The film centers around an ensemble cast of characters as they narrowly escape multiple catastrophes in an effort to reach ships in the Himalayas, along with scientists and governments of the world who are attempting to save as many lives as they can before the disasters ensue.
I think,it will be, for its audiences, one of the most satisfactory films of the year and it really can be called the "mother of all disaster movies".
《蜘蛛俠2》英語影評
情節想必都知道，以下是影評
So what's your choice between being a common person or a hero with people's respects? Most people will choose the latter. But what will be your choice if the cost is laying your lover among the risks? What will it be if the cost is you can never tell the girl, who you love so much, that you love her? The spider man had this contradiction. But finally he still chose the latter, not in order to be a hero, but to make this word peaceful.
I was so moved by the words the Aunt Mary said:
You will never guess what he wants to be, the spider man. He knows the hero when he sees one, too a few characters out there, flying all around out there, saving old girls like me. Lord knows kids like Henry need hero courageous, sacrificing for people, setting examples for all of us. Everybody loves a hero. People enthrone them, cheer them, scream their names and years later they will tell how they stood in the rain for hours just to get a glimpse the one who taught them to hold on to stand longer. I believe there is a hero in all of us. They keep us be honest, give us strength, make us noble, and finally allow us to die with proud. Ever though sometimes we have to initiatively give up the thing we want most, even our dreams. Spider man did that for Henry, so he wants to know where he is gone. He needs him.
The spider man got much from these words, so did I. And what about you? what's the hero lying in you?
2012劇情
傑克·傑克遜（約翰·庫薩克飾）帶著孩子去黃石公園度假，卻發現曾有美好回憶的湖泊已經乾涸了，而這個地區也成為了禁區。充滿疑惑的他在黃石附近的營地偶然認識了查理。查理告訴他由於自然環境和資源長期被人類掠奪性破壞，地球自身的平衡系統已經面臨崩潰，人類即將面臨空前的自然災害。查理說有些國家已經在聯合秘密研製並建造可以躲避這個災難的方舟。傑克遜以為他是個瘋子就一笑而過走開了。
第二天災難發生了。強烈的地震伴隨大量隕石的墜落，讓眼前熟悉的家園變成了人間煉獄。在地球的其他地方，各種各樣的自然災害也以前所未有的規模爆發。傑克遜和眾多家庭一樣踏上了求生之路。面對全球性的自然災害，不知何去何從的他突然想起查理提到過的方舟和地圖，於是決定前往方舟基地尋找生存的機會。
在尋找和前往方舟基地的過程中，傑克遜一家在經歷災難的生死考驗之後終於到達了方舟基地。然而已經製造完成的方舟數量遠遠不能滿足從世界各地聞訊涌來的受災人群。
誰去誰留已然成為挑戰整個人類的道德抉擇。面對災難，來自不同國家的人類做出了最重要的抉擇：「所有人都是平等的，都有平等的生存機會！」最後人類終於在方舟中度過了這一全球性的災害，獲得了繼續繁衍和發展的希望。
2012英文影評：
The world is ending in a matter of hours, yet justice and humanity don』t penetrate through the brain-shells of politicians. In order to save their own lives, the government officials keep the secret from the rest of human kind and also lets the man whose knowledge saves their lives die. This is the premise of 2012.
But if the viewer is a Tibetan or someone who is aware of the Tibetan culture and the sensitivities of Tibetan issue, one could feel that the justice and humanity are not occurred in the director』s thought either.
There is a scene long enough to mention that takes place in Tibet. In fact the last human beings die there and the new seed of the future human race starts at the neck of Mount Everest, 「The People』s Republic of China」 the movie calls it. Perhaps what no movie reviewer noticed or saw the importance of mentioning is that the prophetic fictitious story of the movie not only makes a statement that Tibet is completely a part of China, but also it totally misrepresents the core culture of Tibetan people. A Tibetan woman killing animals in Tibet is taboo, it never happened except ring the Cultural Revolution when some women were forced to do so. Women killing chickens in the Chinese market is an everyday event, but a Tibetan woman killing a CHICKEN reflects the director』s cultural ignorance and it makes the movie even more ridiculous.
And in real life ethically speaking, Mr. Emmerich failed to hire Tibetan actors who can speak their own language. All the actors who play Tibetan characters are Chinese very poorly pretending to be Tibetans. Their Tibetan is hundred times worse than Zhang Yi』s memorized English or Leonardo DiCaprio』s Swahili (well I can imagine!).
影評翻譯
世界是結束一個小時的問題，但正義和人類不穿透腦政治家炮彈。為了挽救自己的生命，政府官員遠離了人類的其餘的秘密，也讓男子的知識，能拯救他們的生命死亡。這是2012年的前提。
但是，如果觀眾是藏族還是有人知道誰是藏族文化和西藏問題的敏感性，人們可以認為，正義和人類沒有在導演的思想也發生了。
現場有一個足夠長一提的是發生在西藏的。事實上，最後死在那裡人類和未來的人類新的種子開始在珠穆朗瑪峰的脖子，說：「人民中國共和國」的影片調用它。或許沒有發現或電影評論家看到一提的重要的是，預言的電影虛構的故事，不僅使聲明說，西藏是完全是中國的一部分，而且是完全歪曲了西藏人民的核心文化。殺害一名西藏婦女西藏動物是禁忌，但從來沒有發生過除文革期間當一些婦女被強迫他們這樣做。殺害婦女在中國市場的雞的日常事件，而是一個藏族婦女殺雞反映了導演的文化無知，這讓電影更可笑。
而在現實生活中講道德，艾里奇先生沒有聘請藏族演員誰可以講自己的語言。所有的演員扮演藏文字元誰是華人很差冒充西藏人。藏族是100倍不如章尾的背英語或萊昂納多迪卡普里奧的斯瓦希里語（好，我可以想像！）。
以上是復制的。。。。回答人： 愛的雙重魔力∮
其實你好好在網上找一下都會有的。
2. 要兩篇英文電影的影評，要求是英文，帶翻譯。。
"Spider-Man 3" to the large American-style American justice line, Stars and Stripes provides some background under a continuation of this tradition. Director of the Song and Dance Drama introction of a number of elements to make the movie tough transition soft lines. But many of them still exposed the inadequacies, such as the introction of the three opponents make films delicate enough. Although the three opponents makes the selling point of the film rich enough to describe the convincing. May is a long-time director of the restrictions on expression, that is to be regretted. The feelings expressed in the drama, the drama pm, because shear. Make no feelings lines, "Spider-Man 2" high. Directors may wish to use Parker and Harry's friendship elements to complement this part, it is regrettable that these were part of human nature to hide. After all, more than two hours of film shear Association inevitable lot of directors was reluctant to cut off part. Oh, the film overall is very strong. It should be said that the main thrust of expression is very delicate, very chewing head. Rhythm is still continuation of a rapid tradition. The taste is worth careful film. 《蜘蛛俠3》繼續了美式大片美國式的正義路線，星條旗下的背影延續了這個傳統。導演引入了一些歌舞劇的的元素力求使得影片硬朗的線條變的柔和。但當中還是露出很多的不足，比如三個敵手的引入使得影片的細膩不夠。雖然三個敵手使得電影的賣點豐富，可刻畫的不夠有說服力。可能是片長的時間限制了導演的表達，可不得不說是個遺憾。在感情戲的表達方面，戲分被剪切的所剩無幾。使得感情線路沒有《蜘蛛俠2》的飽滿。可能導演希望用帕克和哈里的友誼元素來補充這部分，但是很遺憾這些被人性的部分給掩蓋了。 review: Se jie (Lust, Caution) (Venice 2007) 影評《色戒》 因為字數限制，只貼網址給你： http://www.mtime.com/my/shengzi/blog/583312/
希望採納
3. 英文電影影評（漢語即可，不要大熱的）
《危情時速》：另一種形式的豐滿
動作片上映，尤其是特尼-斯科特這種擅長拍攝速度感極強的動作片的導演的作品，通常都被扣上「劇情單薄」的帽子。其實，類型片總有類型化後的目的，就實現目的的程度來看，《危情時速》的劇本可算是豐滿至極。誠然，在兩列火車會車、1206火車頭與777車位銜接、列車通過高架彎道這些段落，導演是利用純粹的剪輯技法和拍攝技法來營造最屏氣凝神的緊張感，但是觀眾之所以能夠在特定段落提前進入屏氣凝神的狀態和心境，卻是與劇本上的扎實分不開的。
此片的劇本讓我想起了兩個很經典案例。一個是1957年Sidney Lumet導演，Reginald Rose編劇的《十二怒漢》。記得有一次參加一個編劇的交流會，曾經有人提到了該片。有一位很年輕的女孩兒當時說：「《十二怒漢》的劇情多簡單啊，單線索，三段式。」當時在座的所有人下巴都掉地上了。從格局上來看，《十二怒漢》卻是是很簡陋，96分鍾時間里有95分鍾都是在同一個屋子裡，同樣的12個人的對話。如此看來，本片的劇情用「單薄、單一、枯燥」等詞來形容一點兒都不為過。可是，本片高明之處，就在於每個角色的個性鮮明，並且通過言語和肢體上的交流，眾人的意識和觀點發生了漸進性的變化。以表決為標志，很明確地將這種遞進的層次感表現了出來。有這種標志和遞進感，即便影片是單一的線索，單一的場景，劇情上的張力也依然是層出不窮的。
另一個例子是大家所熟知的《阿凡達》。很多人都驚嘆於《阿凡達》的畫面表現力，而否定影片的故事的精彩。其實說實話，你回想一下，這部戲根本就沒什麼廢戲。影片里的很多看似很隨意的劇情，其實都擔負著引出畫面表現的任務。換言之，大家能夠這么沉浸在影片的畫面表現，不是因為影片用畫面征服你，而是先設計好圓順的故事情節，然後才把觀眾帶入到這種畫面里來享受的。對比《西風烈》，我們就能明白在畫面表現之前做好故事鋪墊是多麼重要。於是，《阿凡達》的劇本在人物上進行了弱化，在懸念上也進行了弱化，為的就是突出故事上的細節。我們可以看到，影片中屢次出現小起伏和小波折，而每次波折過後就會引出一段或華麗多彩或緊張窒息的視覺段子。
用了這么多話介紹了上面兩個例子，就是為了讓大家了解到，劇本的編寫往往是有一定的目的性的。如果枉顧目的性而執意要在劇本上做文章玩花樣，就會讓人頗為不理解。只有針對影片的目的採用合適的劇情模式才是最牛的。在這一點上，克里斯托弗-諾蘭是最被我所推崇的。回到本片來看，就是故事設計對主題的契合達到了相當高的高度。本片英文片名是「Unstoppable 」，給人一種宿命感。類型為動作驚悚片，主要目的是以驚險的動作場面為觀眾提供視聽上的沖擊。
為了實現「Unstoppable」的感覺，我們看到影片並沒有從一開始就把兩大主演，丹澤爾-華盛頓和克里斯-派恩與「溜車」的777號聯系在一起。其實這是稍微有違常規的。影片一共就這么兩個大牌，可是這兩人在前45分鍾里幾乎與主線劇情脫離，不僅與777沒有關系，還在1206上悠哉悠哉。看似浪費，其實是一個很妙的安排。我們看到，在本片中，火車不是像巴斯特-基頓的《將軍號》那樣是一個「大道具」，而是一個難以被征服的「野獸」。在整個拯救過程中，並不只是兩大主演的英勇表現，而是調動了多種營救方式。這些其它的營救方式是由主角外的其他人實施的。在兩大主演發威之前，已經實施四到五種「Stop」計劃，均以失敗告終。這樣反復實為，一來營造了多起緊張刺激的小高潮，二來從一個側面把777這兩列車塑造成了「有血有肉」的終極大Boss，為影片最後的高潮積攢了情緒上的力量。這種安排最讓我感到有新意的，是影片去掉了「英雄」。讓整個事件看上去更加可信，更加真實。在一場「Unstoppable」的災難面前，可絕不是天降英雄就能助黎民百姓擺脫死亡陰影的。這樣一種形勢，在配合上前40分鍾對兩大主演的淡化描寫，就更顯出了任務的艱巨，以及最後勝利後帶給人的欣慰。這演變成了一場眾人合力後，對怪獸的勝利。不過比較令人可惜的是，影片最最後的的解決方式讓人稍微有些脫力。前面去英雄化近80分鍾，等來的卻依舊是克里斯-派恩非常「英雄」的縱身一躍。不給力啊！不給力！
對於驚險的視聽沖擊，影片在劇情上也進行了極為厚實的輔助工作。大家可以回想一下，影片最給力、最驚險、最刺激的三五場動作戲，哪一場不是在之前的劇情里鋪墊了很多次的？影片從一開始出現危機狀況開始，以後方操控的三方勢力的不斷交流中，我們就提前預知了777號一路上可能會遇到的幾個危險階段。之後所有人的努力就是要讓危險不出現。於是乎，影迷心中的糾結便一直化不開了，這提及的危險地段，777是能到還是不能到，如果777真的到了，究竟是過得去還是過不去？在心情平靜的觀影前和觀影後，我們的理性會告訴自己，這些危險一定會來，如果不來還有啥看頭？這些危險地段777也一定能過去，否則結局如何收尾？但是，當你處於心情不平靜的觀影中時，誰還能理性地去想這些問題，當時是跟隨著劇情的引導去期待這些問題將會以一個什麼樣的具體畫面細節來表現。因此說，動作戲劇本最精彩的地方不在於你設計了什麼危險，設計了如何通過危險，而在於你如何引導觀眾去實現等待危險到來的心情。很顯然，《危情時速》在這方面的表現非常出色，甚至比那幾段動作戲的驚險效果還出色。
影片能夠兼顧高潮段落的驚險刺激和高潮前的逐層鋪墊，又能做到小高潮的豐富不間斷，就是是先了劇情上的豐滿。托尼-斯科特就是好萊塢電影人之所以能夠稱霸全球最好的例子，人家不求全，不求高深，不求大師稱號，就是扎扎實實地為影迷的觀影歷程著想，不僅要在大高潮小高潮的段落里用凌厲的剪輯和高成本的爆破沖擊觀眾的視聽感覺，還要在每一個高潮到來前給你做好心理上的鋪墊。這TMD才是好劇本，好導演！
希望能幫到你！！！
4. 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
5. 英文電影影評100字
《阿凡達》影評：
Avatar is directed by James Cameron.The two main characters are Jake Sully,played by Sam Worthington,and Neytiri,played by Zoe Saldana.
Clones named Avatars are sent to Pandora Planet to persuade people there to leave the planet so that human beings can exploit a rare mineral.Jake is sent there to control his Avatar.
However,he comes across Neytiri and they fall in love with each other.Jake begins to see that nature and the planet should be protected.At last he and the people there work together to defeat human beings and send them back to the earth.
3D technology and the beautiful natural scenery are the two highlights of the film.The message of the film is simple—human beings should protect nature and live in harmony with it.
譯文
《阿凡達》由詹姆斯·卡梅隆執導，兩個主要角色是山姆·沃辛頓飾演的傑克·薩利和佐伊·薩爾達納飾演的奈提莉。
名為阿凡達的克隆人被送往潘多拉星球，勸說那裡的人們離開這個星球，這樣人類就可以開采一種稀有礦物。傑克被送往那裡控制他的阿凡達。
然而，他遇到了奈提莉，他們相愛了。傑克開始意識到大自然和地球應該得到保護。最後，他和那裡的人們一起努力打敗人類，把他們送回地球。
3D技術和美麗的自然風光是這部電影的兩大亮點。電影傳達的信息很簡單——人類應該保護自然，與自然和諧相處。
6. 中英文互譯影評《年輕的維多利亞》
電影很平緩，沒有強烈的戲劇沖突，唯一緊張的就是刺客出現的瞬間，而這還該是個杜撰的情節，其餘的部分一直都靜靜流淌，可能這也和歷史有關系吧，維多利亞不像伊麗莎白一世那樣強勢獨斷，雖然終身未嫁但可以讓所有男人聽從她的意願，維多利亞在位時間雖長，但自己的生活卻像個正常的女人一樣，結婚生子，一輩子沉浸在愛情中。 整個電影最可看的自然是宮廷風，還沒有工業革命的......
Film is very flat, not strong in the theater of conflict, only tense is the assassin appear instantly, and this is the plot is an apocryphal, the rest have been quietly flowing, it is also the relationship between history, Victoria unlike Elizabeth I as a strong independent fault, although lifelong has not married but can let all men follow her will, Victoria ruled time although long, but his life is like a normal woman like, get married and have children and a lifetime immersed in love. The whole film is the most natural to see the palace of the wind, there is no instrial revolution......
7. 求一篇外國電影《外星人et》 的英文影評
《外星人et》 的英文影評：
What is love, love is through all the obstacles, let a person get happiness and joy of good channel。
什麼是愛，愛是穿越一切障礙，讓一個人得到幸福和快樂的好渠道。
I sit at my window, heart can't be calm once, the story finished debunked, but also ripples in mind。
我坐在窗前，心不能平靜一次，故事結束了揭穿，但心裡也泛起漣漪。
This is a science fiction films, elliot is an illusion, the little boy often fantasize that fantasy have aliens exist。
這是科幻電影，艾略特是幻覺，小男孩經常幻想有外星人存在。
ET, who was one of the earth was kind of aliens, but full of love, he found little elliot saved。
Et 是地球上的一個外星人，但是充滿了愛，他發現小 elliot 得救了。
ET, everyday, friendship and love to take care of him to their hearts of bridge tightly together。
每天，友情和愛情把他照顧得和他心中的橋緊緊地連在一起。
although language cannot communicate very well, but their feelings beyond all together, Although appearance has so big difference。
雖然語言不能很好地交流，但是他們的感情超越了一切，雖然外表有那麼大的差異。
but have a docile and purity of heart, between them has established a wonderful telepathy, they became best friends。
但是有一顆善良純潔的心，他們之間建立了一種奇妙的心靈感應，他們成為了最好的朋友。
He remembered the boy and ET live together in good time, they were so happy and happy。
他想起了那個男孩和他一起生活的美好時光，他們是那麼的快樂和幸福。
What makes them together, become good friends?
是什麼讓他們在一起，成為好朋友？
I think this is the power of love, elliot with that kind of love, care the helpless ET, concerned with ET understanding。
我認為這就是愛的力量，艾略特帶著那種愛，關心無助的人，關心理解的人。
8. 電影英語影評 80字左右 加上翻譯
大地雄心
I thought this movie was very well done.It is an overlooked treasure.Ron Howard is a great film maker and he deserves more credit for this film.I'm a huge Ron Howard fan and I felt that this film was no better than any of his work done thus far.The dialog was a bit hard to understand,but the plot,acting and directing are what make the movie so great.Nicole Kidman is so beautiful in the movie and she really carries the movie with her charisma.Tom Cruise plays his part very well.The scenery in the movie is some of the best I've ever seen.It is easy to lose yourself in this movie.I would recommend this movie to anyone I know.
9. 兩篇英文電影的中文影評(500字以上
很久沒有為一部電影寫影評了，這部講初戀的《怦然心動》的電影，真的給人一種怦然心動的感覺。
如果你仔細看，你會發現這個電影是從男孩和女孩兩個角度在講述。比如說一開始的女孩坐在家門口看著鄰居家搬來，並主動去幫忙搬東西，在男孩看來女孩是不識相、麻煩、主動得讓人害怕；但在女孩的角度看來男孩的眼睛是那麼迷人，他很害羞需要她去幫他，甚至連想甩開她其把抓住的手都被她誤認為是男孩主動牽了她的手(╯□╰)~，不禁讓人想到「男人來自火星，女人來自金星」這條真理。故事發生在20世紀60年代的美國小鎮，安靜溫暖又有趣。小女孩朱莉.貝克，從小學二年級就開始了對小男孩布萊斯·羅斯基的暗戀。有時候甚至是明目張膽。而布萊斯.羅斯基從見到朱莉.貝克的第一眼就害怕她，以至於一個7歲的小男孩躲在了媽媽的身後，探出腦袋來打量這個奇怪的女孩。朱莉貝克，的確是奇怪的女孩，她能夠「不識相」地主動去幫鄰居搬東西，大膽的在學校裡面主動的擁抱布萊斯，她能夠爬到一棵的梧桐樹上看這個世界的美好，並在要砍梧桐樹的時候，誓死捍衛，然而只有她一個人。她能夠風雨無阻的給布萊斯送雞蛋，她口中的郵遞員准則。而布萊斯從最初的躲閃，到之後的理解，一路過來是磕磕絆絆。最後，終於克服心中的懦弱和膽小，終於鼓起勇氣准備給朱莉一個盼了很多年的初吻的時候。朱莉.貝克卻躲開了，她跑著回到家，對媽媽說這不是她想要的。她到底想要什麼呢，她曾認為布萊斯擁有世界上最好看，最閃亮的眼睛。然而之後她感覺布萊斯為了得到自己心中的諒解，而對她說抱歉的時候。感覺布萊斯只是一個綉花枕頭。也許布萊斯是真誠，但是他卻不懂表達自己，內斂含蓄。
起先，是布萊斯的家裡生活因為他的父親總是顯得一團糟糕，死氣沉沉。布萊斯的父親總是諷刺鄙視對門朱莉貝克家的庭院以及他們的生活。其實，就像布萊斯自己所說的他父親只是看不起自己而已。他光鮮的外表下似乎有什麼東西在腐爛。布萊斯的父親在其中扮演者一個冷漠、毫無溫情，近乎迂腐的角色。和朱莉貝克一家的人物行成了鮮明的比對，他們熱情、豁達、開朗。即使他們庭院是多麼的難看，即使開著一輛破舊的皮卡。只是因為給朱莉叔叔支付高昂的私人療養所的費用。
喜歡故事裡面那一段，布萊斯和外公獨自在外散步的對話。他外公對他說「這世界上有些人黯淡無光，有些人色彩濃艷，但當你有天遇到一個色彩日彩虹般絢麗的人時，你會覺得其他人只是浮雲而已。」而朱莉貝克，就是那個彩虹般絢麗的人。這樣的人，並不是每一個人都能遇得到的。她有一個畫家的爸爸，善良美麗的母親，兩個才華橫溢的哥哥，不幸的是還有一個因為出生適合被臍帶勒著，導致腦癱的叔叔。所以她家看上去總是那麼糟糕，雜草長滿了庭院，她卻說她從來沒有為此感到自卑，換做是我，或多或少心理會有些介意。但布萊斯說他父親不願意冒險吃她送的雞蛋之後，只是因為她家庭院又臟又亂。朱莉.貝克在餐桌上和父母說了要整理庭院，拮據的家庭生活讓父母兩人陷入爭吵，這是朱莉第一次看見父母如此嚴厲的爭吵。她父母輪流對她道歉，她說會為父母感到難過，但同時為擁有這樣的父母感到幸福和溫暖。
那棵梧桐樹，我不知道象徵著什麼。但其中肯定是有包括愛情。朱莉爬上那棵樹說是看到了世界上最美好的風景，她總是建議布萊斯和他一起爬樹，但布萊斯總是找理由搪塞過去，他也許是怕小時候的那句話「布萊斯和朱莉爬上樹，卿卿我我親個夠」。無奈樹被砍倒了，她捂著臉哭了好幾個星期，那棵對她來說象徵著美，象徵著全世界。但最後那樹變成牆上一幅美麗的畫，只能遠遠回想那片漂浮著各色雲彩的藍天。影片的海報是朱莉和布萊斯，坐在粗大的枝幹上，看著紫色的天空。影片最後，布萊斯在一個周日的陽光很好天氣，在朱莉家的草坪上種上了一株梧桐樹苗。兩只小手不經意的碰觸到一起。簡單的初戀故事總是讓人在感動之餘，不會領悟到太多的什麼，或許有，這只是青春美好的初戀而已，真的很喜歡影片中女主角那張青春純真的笑臉。只是那一刻，怦然心動。