『壹』 求經典美國電影影評，最好是英文版的，中文也行，一個電影最好有多個影評 發776900490，非常感謝了
網上資源很多的，列舉兩個~
《肖申克的救贖》的英文影評 版本二郵件發給你
Though adapted from a Stephen King novella, "The Shawshank Redemption" has more to do with a man's internal demons than the kind that routinely rise up from overgrown graveyards. Like "Stand by Me," it's not a typical story from the horror King. Instead, it's a devoutly old-fashioned, spiritually uplifting prison drama about two lifers who must break their emotional shackles before they can finally become free men.
Set in a spooky old penitentiary with turrets and towers, the movie manages to be true to its Big House origins while incorporating such horrific mainstays as the clanking of chains and the creaking of the walls. There's even a raven that roosts in the prison library, where he is cared for by a darling old trusty (James Whitmore). For the most part, however, the movie expands upon cliches that date back to James Cagney's prison portraits梩he twisted warden (Bob Gunton) and the sadistic guard (Clancy Brown).
Director Frank Darabont, who apprenticed on B-scripts ("The Fly II") and TV movies ("Buried Alive"), manages to fashion an improbable new pattern from the same old material in his remarkable debut. While he deals with the grimmest aspects of prison life (sadistic guards, gang rapes and befouled food), Darabont is chiefly interested in the 20-year friendship that sustains Andy (Tim Robbins) and Red (Morgan Freeman) .
The movie opens in 1947 as Andy, a prominent New England banker, is on trial for murdering his wife and her lover. Not only did he have a motive, but he had the opportunity梙is footprints were found at the scene of the crime梐nd he had a weapon of the caliber used in the shootings. He insists that he is innocent, but the jury finds him guilty. Sentenced to life twice over, Andy is shipped to the maximum-security state prison at Shawshank, Maine. An introverted loner with an interest in reading, chess and rock carving, Andy doesn't make himself many friends until Red, a 30-year-veteran of the system, decides to take him under his wing.
Things begin to change for the better when Andy finds a way to use his skills and ecation to benefit his fellow felons. When he overhears the guard captain complaining about losing most of an inheritance to taxes, he offers to trade his advice for three beers for each of the men who are working with him that day tarring the roof.
His reputation as a financial adviser spreads, and soon he is doing the taxes for all the guards and running the warden's outside scams. This leads to a position in the tiny prison library, which Andy graally expands into the best ecational facility of its kind in the area. It takes him six years to do it, but Andy never gives up hope.
It is hope that allows the self-proclaimed innocent man to survive what may or may not be an unjust imprisonment. And hope is his gift to his friend Red, who no longer even tries to impress the parole board at his hearings. He's become "institutionalized," he explains to Andy, and would be a "nobody" on the outside.
Red's gift to Andy is absolution when he finally confesses his true sins. Whether or not he pulled the trigger, Andy blames himself for causing his wife's death; his redemption comes as he learns to give of himself over the course of this marvelously acted and directed film.
Robbins gives a performance that evolves with beautiful clarity from starchy banker to warm and loving friend. Freeman is sure to gain his third Oscar nomination for his portrayal of Red. He also reads the film's lovely narration, much of it drawn verbatim from King's 1982 novella.
A detailed portrait of the routine of cellblock life, "The Shawshank Redemption" might change a few minds about the usefulness of incarceration in terms of rehabilitation. Mostly, though, it reminds us of that we all hold the keys to our own prisons.
《楚門的世界》英文影評The Truman Show'' is founded on an enormous secret that all of the studio's advertising has been determined to reveal. I didn't know the secret when I saw the film, and was able to enjoy the little doubts and wonderings that the filmmakers so carefully planted. If by some good chance you do not know the secret, read no further.
Those fortunate audience members (I trust they have all left the room?) will be able to appreciate the meticulous way director Peter Weir and writer Andrew Niccol have constructed a jigsaw plot around their central character, who doesn't suspect that he's living his entire life on live television. Yes, he lives in an improbably ideal world, but I fell for that: I assumed the movie was taking a sitcom view of life, in which neighbors greet each other over white picket fences, and Ozzie and Harriet are real people.
Actually, it's Seaside, a planned community on the Gulf Coast near Tampa. Called Seahaven in the movie, it looks like a nice place to live. Certainly Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) doesn't know anything else. You accept the world you're given, the filmmakers suggest; more thoughtful viewers will get the buried message, which is that we accept almost everything in our lives without examining it very closely. When was the last time you reflected on how really odd a tree looks? Truman works as a sales executive at an insurance company, is happily married to Meryl (Laura Linney), and doesn't find it suspicious that she describes household procts in the language of TV commercials. He is happy, in a way, but an uneasiness gnaws away at him. Something is missing, and he thinks perhaps he might find it in Fiji, where Lauren (Natascha McElhone), the only woman he really loved, allegedly has moved with her family.
Why did she leave so quickly? Perhaps because she was not a safe bet for Truman's world: The actress who played her (named Sylvia) developed real feeling and pity for Truman, and felt he should know the truth about his existence. Meryl, on the other hand, is a reliable pro (which raises the question, unanswered, of their sex life).
Truman's world is controlled by a TV procer named Christof (Ed Harris), whose control room is high in the artificial dome that provides the sky and horizon of Seahaven. He discusses his programming on talk shows, and dismisses the protests of those (including Sylvia) who believe Truman is the victim of a cruel deception. Meanwhile, the whole world watches Truman's every move, and some viewers even leave the TV on all night, as he sleeps.
The trajectory of the screenplay is more or less inevitable: Truman must graally realize the truth of his environment, and try to escape from it. It's clever the way he's kept on his island by implanted traumas about travel and water. As the story unfolds, however, we're not simply expected to follow it: We're invited to think about the implications. About a world in which modern communications make celebrity possible, and inhuman.
Until fairly recently, the only way you could become really famous was to be royalty, or a writer, actor, preacher or politician--and even then, most people had knowledge of you only through words or printed pictures.
Television, with its insatiable hunger for material, has made celebrities into ``content,'' devouring their lives and secrets. If you think ``The Truman Show'' is an exaggeration, reflect that Princess Diana lived under similar conditions from the day she became engaged to Charles.
Carrey is a surprisingly good choice to play Truman. We catch glimpses of his manic comic persona, just to make us comfortable with his presence in the character, but this is a well-planned performance; Carrey is on the right note as a guy raised to be liked and likable, who decides his life requires more risk and hardship. Like the angels in ``City of Angels,'' he'd like to take his chances.
Ed Harris also finds the right notes as Christof, the TV svengali. He uses the technospeak by which we distance ourselves from the real meanings of our words. (If TV procers ever spoke frankly about what they were really doing, they'd come across like Bulworth.) For Harris, the demands of the show take precedence over any other values, and if you think that's an exaggeration, tell it to the TV news people who broadcast that Los Angeles suicide.
I enjoyed ``The Truman Show'' on its levels of comedy and drama; I liked Truman in the same way I liked Forrest Gump--because he was a good man, honest, and easy to sympathize with.
But the underlying ideas made the movie more than just entertainment. Like ``Gattaca,'' the previous film written by Niccol, it brings into focus the new values that technology is forcing on humanity.
Because we can engineer genetics, because we can telecast real lives--of course we must, right? But are these good things to do? The irony is, the people who will finally answer that question will be the very ones proced by the process.
如果你找不到，還需要的話，歡迎繼續聯系
『貳』 求一篇外國電影《外星人et》 的英文影評
《外星人et》 的英文影評：
What is love, love is through all the obstacles, let a person get happiness and joy of good channel。
什麼是愛，愛是穿越一切障礙，讓一個人得到幸福和快樂的好渠道。
I sit at my window, heart can't be calm once, the story finished debunked, but also ripples in mind。
我坐在窗前，心不能平靜一次，故事結束了揭穿，但心裡也泛起漣漪。
This is a science fiction films, elliot is an illusion, the little boy often fantasize that fantasy have aliens exist。
這是科幻電影，艾略特是幻覺，小男孩經常幻想有外星人存在。
ET, who was one of the earth was kind of aliens, but full of love, he found little elliot saved。
Et 是地球上的一個外星人，但是充滿了愛，他發現小 elliot 得救了。
ET, everyday, friendship and love to take care of him to their hearts of bridge tightly together。
每天，友情和愛情把他照顧得和他心中的橋緊緊地連在一起。
although language cannot communicate very well, but their feelings beyond all together, Although appearance has so big difference。
雖然語言不能很好地交流，但是他們的感情超越了一切，雖然外表有那麼大的差異。
but have a docile and purity of heart, between them has established a wonderful telepathy, they became best friends。
但是有一顆善良純潔的心，他們之間建立了一種奇妙的心靈感應，他們成為了最好的朋友。
He remembered the boy and ET live together in good time, they were so happy and happy。
他想起了那個男孩和他一起生活的美好時光，他們是那麼的快樂和幸福。
What makes them together, become good friends?
是什麼讓他們在一起，成為好朋友？
I think this is the power of love, elliot with that kind of love, care the helpless ET, concerned with ET understanding。
我認為這就是愛的力量，艾略特帶著那種愛，關心無助的人，關心理解的人。
『叄』 求三部英文電影的影評【英文的】150詞左右
三個片子以及影評如下：
電梯里的惡魔 Devil
2012
茜茜公主 Sissi
————————————————————————————————
電梯里的惡魔 Devil
Finally, when the police Bowden to send Tony home, I thought the devil attached to Bowden's body. But I really, really did not expect, he said, facing the mirror looked at Tony, I forgive you. Narrating said, every time my mother gave me finish those (demons) of the story, she would comfort us, the children, do not worry, if the devil is true, then God is also true. (Don't worry, she'd say, if the devil is real, then God must be real too.) And then the whole city was quiet and bright look.
I was a little shock this last sentence, I am not a Christian, but I believe the devil is really just refers to the devil, God is not merely referring to God. The devil is the darkness of evil, which is why each person killed in the elevator when they are in the darkness, and God is the light of justice, which is why after the disappearance of the old woman everything normal.
So do not be afraid, if the devil is true, then God must be true.
_________________________
2012
2012 is a 2009 disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich. The film stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Danny Glover, Thandie Newton and Woody Harrelson. It was distributed by Columbia Pictures. Filming began in August 2008 in Vancouver.
The film briefly references Mayanism, the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, and the 2012 phenomenon in its portrayal of cataclysmic events unfolding in the year 2012. Because of solar flare bombardment the Earth's core begins heating up at an unprecedented rate, eventually causing crustal displacement. This results in an onslaught of Doomsday event scenarios plunging the world into chaos, ranging from California falling into the Pacific Ocean, the eruption of the Yellowstone National Park caldera, massive earthquakes, and Megatsunami impacts along every coast line on the Earth. The film centers around an ensemble cast of characters as they narrowly escape multiple catastrophes in an effort to reach ships in the Himalayas, along with scientists and governments of the world who are attempting to save as many lives as they can before the disasters ensue.
I think,it will be, for its audiences, one of the most satisfactory films of the year and it really can be called the "mother of all disaster movies".
________________________
茜茜公主 Sissi
Two hundred years have passed, or relish the Austrians who had their moment in the Queen's situation, her beauty, her worries, her bit by bit, everything is all her people food for thought. But I know after the end of her life, but an infinite loss, the original Romy. Schneider played sissi not really her, that does not belong to her own happiness, but the movie is the story of a beautiful dream has fallen. Once said, are taken out of context a beautiful fairy tale, this story was altered into fairy confused, when you see the true colors of the story when he realize that this world is no fairy tale, happy people are always so few, immortal There are so many stories are deeply investigated for the content unbearable. We too are keen to have the perfect fairy-tale, right then, so many continue to perfect the story, and finally opened the veil that layer of dough, the result is the dashed dreams.
You are such a woman, always in the history of a similar no shortage, your beauty is not unprecedented nor non-repeatable, but reflects that women have tragic life, can not control the fate of many of the total, let us no alternative but to sigh, the original spirit of freedom is very important, it is that some people can not pursue to a lifetime thing.
『肆』 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
『伍』 跪求外國電影英語影評！！ 要求：有台詞，有翻譯，不要太難，不要太長，最晚明天中午告我答案，急用，謝了
泰坦尼克號英語影評為：Titanic enriches us with a romantic story of young love, passion and feelings, full of dreams .This is one of the films that most shocked the general public in the last twenty years. The story of Titannic is full of strength and feeling, with great dramatic content.and amazing words："God shall wipe away all the tears from their eyes, and there shall be no more death. Neither shall there be sorrow or dying, neither shall there be any more pain, for the former world has passed away 「. Success is understandable If we add the stunning beauty of the image, thanks to advances in digital technology . Fairy successful movie, which tells the story of the sinking of the ship, but in the background shows a passionate love story. It achieves a harmonious balance in that, in the mix of history and feelings, and makes it almost perfect.
中文為：
泰坦尼克號豐富了我們一個浪漫的故事，年輕的愛，激情和感情，充滿了夢想，這是一部在過去的二十年最震驚公眾電影。泰坦尼克號的故事以其豐富的內容和經典的語言使人充滿了力量：「上帝擦去他們所有的眼淚，死亡已經不再,也不再有悲傷和生死離別,不再有痛苦,因往事已矣」。如果我們把絕色美女的形象，由於數字技術的進步，成功是可以理解的。非常成功的電影，它講述了沉沒的船，但在背景中展示了一個充滿激情的愛情故事。它達到了一種和諧的平衡，在混合的歷史和感受，並使得它幾乎完美。
『陸』 求篇英文電影的中英文影評
2012是一部美國的電影。這是一部激動人心的電影。2012重要講了在2012時世界將會被毀滅，然而一部分人活下來的故事。看完這部電影，我每天都在思考世界末日這件事，我很害怕也很好奇。這部電影十分精彩，劇情也很驚險。這部電影也告訴我們要保護我們這個地球，愛護壞境，也要珍愛生命。2012給我很多啟示，希望大家也去看看。這是多麼好的一部電影呀！2012 is an exciting American movie. It tells the story that everything on earth is destroyed in a disaster in the year 2012, only a small percentage of human beings survived. After watching the movie, I ponder a lot about the end of the world everyday, because I am both afraid and curious about it. This is an excellent movie with a thrilling storyline. It tells us that we should protect the earth and the environment, as well as all creatures on earth. 2012 teaches me a lot, I think everyone should go and see it. What a good movie it is!
『柒』 英文電影影評（漢語即可，不要大熱的）
《危情時速》：另一種形式的豐滿
動作片上映，尤其是特尼-斯科特這種擅長拍攝速度感極強的動作片的導演的作品，通常都被扣上「劇情單薄」的帽子。其實，類型片總有類型化後的目的，就實現目的的程度來看，《危情時速》的劇本可算是豐滿至極。誠然，在兩列火車會車、1206火車頭與777車位銜接、列車通過高架彎道這些段落，導演是利用純粹的剪輯技法和拍攝技法來營造最屏氣凝神的緊張感，但是觀眾之所以能夠在特定段落提前進入屏氣凝神的狀態和心境，卻是與劇本上的扎實分不開的。
此片的劇本讓我想起了兩個很經典案例。一個是1957年Sidney Lumet導演，Reginald Rose編劇的《十二怒漢》。記得有一次參加一個編劇的交流會，曾經有人提到了該片。有一位很年輕的女孩兒當時說：「《十二怒漢》的劇情多簡單啊，單線索，三段式。」當時在座的所有人下巴都掉地上了。從格局上來看，《十二怒漢》卻是是很簡陋，96分鍾時間里有95分鍾都是在同一個屋子裡，同樣的12個人的對話。如此看來，本片的劇情用「單薄、單一、枯燥」等詞來形容一點兒都不為過。可是，本片高明之處，就在於每個角色的個性鮮明，並且通過言語和肢體上的交流，眾人的意識和觀點發生了漸進性的變化。以表決為標志，很明確地將這種遞進的層次感表現了出來。有這種標志和遞進感，即便影片是單一的線索，單一的場景，劇情上的張力也依然是層出不窮的。
另一個例子是大家所熟知的《阿凡達》。很多人都驚嘆於《阿凡達》的畫面表現力，而否定影片的故事的精彩。其實說實話，你回想一下，這部戲根本就沒什麼廢戲。影片里的很多看似很隨意的劇情，其實都擔負著引出畫面表現的任務。換言之，大家能夠這么沉浸在影片的畫面表現，不是因為影片用畫面征服你，而是先設計好圓順的故事情節，然後才把觀眾帶入到這種畫面里來享受的。對比《西風烈》，我們就能明白在畫面表現之前做好故事鋪墊是多麼重要。於是，《阿凡達》的劇本在人物上進行了弱化，在懸念上也進行了弱化，為的就是突出故事上的細節。我們可以看到，影片中屢次出現小起伏和小波折，而每次波折過後就會引出一段或華麗多彩或緊張窒息的視覺段子。
用了這么多話介紹了上面兩個例子，就是為了讓大家了解到，劇本的編寫往往是有一定的目的性的。如果枉顧目的性而執意要在劇本上做文章玩花樣，就會讓人頗為不理解。只有針對影片的目的採用合適的劇情模式才是最牛的。在這一點上，克里斯托弗-諾蘭是最被我所推崇的。回到本片來看，就是故事設計對主題的契合達到了相當高的高度。本片英文片名是「Unstoppable 」，給人一種宿命感。類型為動作驚悚片，主要目的是以驚險的動作場面為觀眾提供視聽上的沖擊。
為了實現「Unstoppable」的感覺，我們看到影片並沒有從一開始就把兩大主演，丹澤爾-華盛頓和克里斯-派恩與「溜車」的777號聯系在一起。其實這是稍微有違常規的。影片一共就這么兩個大牌，可是這兩人在前45分鍾里幾乎與主線劇情脫離，不僅與777沒有關系，還在1206上悠哉悠哉。看似浪費，其實是一個很妙的安排。我們看到，在本片中，火車不是像巴斯特-基頓的《將軍號》那樣是一個「大道具」，而是一個難以被征服的「野獸」。在整個拯救過程中，並不只是兩大主演的英勇表現，而是調動了多種營救方式。這些其它的營救方式是由主角外的其他人實施的。在兩大主演發威之前，已經實施四到五種「Stop」計劃，均以失敗告終。這樣反復實為，一來營造了多起緊張刺激的小高潮，二來從一個側面把777這兩列車塑造成了「有血有肉」的終極大Boss，為影片最後的高潮積攢了情緒上的力量。這種安排最讓我感到有新意的，是影片去掉了「英雄」。讓整個事件看上去更加可信，更加真實。在一場「Unstoppable」的災難面前，可絕不是天降英雄就能助黎民百姓擺脫死亡陰影的。這樣一種形勢，在配合上前40分鍾對兩大主演的淡化描寫，就更顯出了任務的艱巨，以及最後勝利後帶給人的欣慰。這演變成了一場眾人合力後，對怪獸的勝利。不過比較令人可惜的是，影片最最後的的解決方式讓人稍微有些脫力。前面去英雄化近80分鍾，等來的卻依舊是克里斯-派恩非常「英雄」的縱身一躍。不給力啊！不給力！
對於驚險的視聽沖擊，影片在劇情上也進行了極為厚實的輔助工作。大家可以回想一下，影片最給力、最驚險、最刺激的三五場動作戲，哪一場不是在之前的劇情里鋪墊了很多次的？影片從一開始出現危機狀況開始，以後方操控的三方勢力的不斷交流中，我們就提前預知了777號一路上可能會遇到的幾個危險階段。之後所有人的努力就是要讓危險不出現。於是乎，影迷心中的糾結便一直化不開了，這提及的危險地段，777是能到還是不能到，如果777真的到了，究竟是過得去還是過不去？在心情平靜的觀影前和觀影後，我們的理性會告訴自己，這些危險一定會來，如果不來還有啥看頭？這些危險地段777也一定能過去，否則結局如何收尾？但是，當你處於心情不平靜的觀影中時，誰還能理性地去想這些問題，當時是跟隨著劇情的引導去期待這些問題將會以一個什麼樣的具體畫面細節來表現。因此說，動作戲劇本最精彩的地方不在於你設計了什麼危險，設計了如何通過危險，而在於你如何引導觀眾去實現等待危險到來的心情。很顯然，《危情時速》在這方面的表現非常出色，甚至比那幾段動作戲的驚險效果還出色。
影片能夠兼顧高潮段落的驚險刺激和高潮前的逐層鋪墊，又能做到小高潮的豐富不間斷，就是是先了劇情上的豐滿。托尼-斯科特就是好萊塢電影人之所以能夠稱霸全球最好的例子，人家不求全，不求高深，不求大師稱號，就是扎扎實實地為影迷的觀影歷程著想，不僅要在大高潮小高潮的段落里用凌厲的剪輯和高成本的爆破沖擊觀眾的視聽感覺，還要在每一個高潮到來前給你做好心理上的鋪墊。這TMD才是好劇本，好導演！
希望能幫到你！！！
『捌』 要兩篇英文電影的影評，要求是英文，帶翻譯。。
"Spider-Man 3" to the large American-style American justice line, Stars and Stripes provides some background under a continuation of this tradition. Director of the Song and Dance Drama introction of a number of elements to make the movie tough transition soft lines. But many of them still exposed the inadequacies, such as the introction of the three opponents make films delicate enough. Although the three opponents makes the selling point of the film rich enough to describe the convincing. May is a long-time director of the restrictions on expression, that is to be regretted. The feelings expressed in the drama, the drama pm, because shear. Make no feelings lines, "Spider-Man 2" high. Directors may wish to use Parker and Harry's friendship elements to complement this part, it is regrettable that these were part of human nature to hide. After all, more than two hours of film shear Association inevitable lot of directors was reluctant to cut off part. Oh, the film overall is very strong. It should be said that the main thrust of expression is very delicate, very chewing head. Rhythm is still continuation of a rapid tradition. The taste is worth careful film. 《蜘蛛俠3》繼續了美式大片美國式的正義路線，星條旗下的背影延續了這個傳統。導演引入了一些歌舞劇的的元素力求使得影片硬朗的線條變的柔和。但當中還是露出很多的不足，比如三個敵手的引入使得影片的細膩不夠。雖然三個敵手使得電影的賣點豐富，可刻畫的不夠有說服力。可能是片長的時間限制了導演的表達，可不得不說是個遺憾。在感情戲的表達方面，戲分被剪切的所剩無幾。使得感情線路沒有《蜘蛛俠2》的飽滿。可能導演希望用帕克和哈里的友誼元素來補充這部分，但是很遺憾這些被人性的部分給掩蓋了。 review: Se jie (Lust, Caution) (Venice 2007) 影評《色戒》 因為字數限制，只貼網址給你： http://www.mtime.com/my/shengzi/blog/583312/
希望採納